Get the fair value you deserve for your totaled vehicle in Maine

Maine regulates first-party automobile total losses through statutory authorities in Title 24-A: the Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act at 24-A M.R.S. § 2164-D (regulatory, no private right of action under the section itself per § 2164-D(8)), the late-payment statute at 24-A M.R.S. § 2436, and the private-right-of-action statute at 24-A M.R.S. § 2436-A. Maine does not recognize a common-law first-party bad-faith tort — the Maine Supreme Judicial Court declined to do so in Marquis v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance Co., 628 A.2d 644 (Me. 1993), reasoning that the legislature had spoken through §§ 2436 and 2436-A. Maine does not impose a separate licensing requirement on a policyholder's appraiser invoked under the policy's appraisal clause. 24-A M.R.S. § 2164-D — Unfair Claim Settlement Practices. The statute defines acts that constitute unfair claim settlement practices, including: misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions; failing to acknowledge and act with reasonable promptness on claim communications; failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims; refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation; failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time; not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements when liability is reasonably clear; and compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due. Section 2164-D(8) provides that "This section may not be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for violation of this section"; the private remedy lives in § 2436-A. 24-A M.R.S. § 2436-A — Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Private Right of Action. Maine is one of a small number of states with an explicit private right of action under the UCSPA. The statute provides that any insured aggrieved by an unfair claim settlement practice may recover damages, costs and disbursements, reasonable attorney's fees, and interest on damages at 1.5% per month. The 1.5%-per-month interest provision (often referenced as an 18%-per-annum effective rate) is unusually robust as a statutory floor for time-value-of-money exposure. 24-A M.R.S. § 2436 — Late Payment of Claims. Maine's late-payment statute sets timing rules for the payment or denial of claims; the precise statutory deadline varies by claim type (for example, the statute references a 60-day window for certain fire-insurance contexts). Readers should consult the current text of § 2436 alongside § 2436-A's 1.5%-per-month interest provision for the operative deadlines on a given claim. Maine total-loss valuation methodology. Maine does not appear to have a comprehensive total-loss valuation regulation analogous to Massachusetts 211 CMR 133 or Maryland COMAR 31.15.12. Maine total-loss claims are governed by the policy's terms and by general UCSPA principles under § 2164-D, with statutory comparable-vehicle restrictions in 24-A M.R.S. § 2910-B (enacted in 2021) limiting comparables in certain contexts. Marquis v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance Co., 628 A.2d 644 (Me. 1993). The Maine Supreme Judicial Court declined to recognize a common-law first-party bad-faith tort, holding that the legislature had spoken through §§ 2436 and 2436-A and that creating a parallel tort would be inconsistent with the legislative scheme. Subsequent Maine decisions have reaffirmed Marquis; § 2436-A remains the primary statutory lever, with its damages + costs + attorney's fees + 1.5%/month interest structure. Maine salvage titling is governed by the current Title 29-A salvage provisions; Maine does not appear to codify a specific percentage-of-fair-market-value threshold by statute (29-A M.R.S. § 1855 has been repealed). Industry practice in Maine is commonly described as following the Total Loss Formula, an industry methodology rather than a statutory percentage. Maine does not impose a separate licensing requirement on a policyholder's appraiser invoked under the policy's appraisal clause.

Maine's first-party insurance jurisprudence is shaped by a deliberate legislative choice — the codification of an explicit UCSPA private right of action at 24-A M.R.S. § 2436-A — combined with a Supreme Judicial Court decision (Marquis v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance Co., 628 A.2d 644 (Me. 1993)) declining to recognize a separate common-law bad-faith tort. Marquis held that the legislature had spoken through §§ 2436 and 2436-A and that creating a parallel common-law tort would be inconsistent with the legislative scheme. The § 2436-A statutory framework that Marquis preserved provides damages, costs and disbursements, reasonable attorney's fees, and interest on damages at 1.5% per month — a meaningful private remedy that does not require the malice or "no reasonable basis" showing many states' bad-faith torts demand. In the auto-claim total-loss context, multistate class actions targeting "typical-negotiation adjustment" and similar undocumented Audatex/CCC line items have been pleaded in Maine as § 2164-D unfair-practices predicates feeding into § 2436-A private-right-of-action claims, with § 2436-A's 1.5%-per-month interest layered on top. The combined statutory framework generates settlement leverage without requiring proof of common-law bad faith.