Travelers total-loss settlements in New Hampshire: how to negotiate a fair offer

Travelers writes ~2% of US auto policies, and their total-loss claims process is broadly the same from state to state. What changes in New Hampshire is the legal backdrop:

• Total-loss threshold: 75% of pre-loss value. Once cost-of-repair reaches 75% of pre-loss ACV, Travelers is required to declare a total loss instead of authorizing repair.
• Appraiser-licensing rules: New Hampshire does not impose a special licensing requirement on the independent appraiser you retain under your policy's appraisal clause.
• Appraisal-clause availability: Standard auto policies in New Hampshire — including Travelers's — contain an appraisal clause. That gives you the contractual right to demand a binding independent appraisal when Travelers and you can't agree on the vehicle's actual cash value.

• Conservative comparable selection bias
• Slow to credit options not in the standard package list
• Often delays valuation reports

In New Hampshire markets specifically, we frequently see comparable vehicles pulled from outside the local trade radius, condition adjustments applied without supporting photographs, and mileage curves that don't reflect the New Hampshire retail reality. Each of those is a documented attack surface.

1. Request the full Audatex Autosource report from Travelers in writing — not just the summary letter.
2. Verify mileage, condition, equipment, and (for some carriers) the typical-negotiation discount line-by-line against the published Audatex Autosource methodology.
3. Pull current dealer listings within 50-100 miles of your New Hampshire zip code for vehicles that match your year/make/model/trim.
4. Build a documented counter-valuation that lists every error and cites every supporting comparable.
5. Send the counter to your Travelers adjuster in writing with a 5-7 business-day response deadline.
6. If they don't move materially, escalate to a supervisor and demand itemized justification for every adjustment.
7. Invoke the appraisal clause in writing if the supervisor's response is still inadequate. New Hampshire supports your right to retain an independent appraiser.

New Hampshire Admin. Code § Ins 1002.15 — Total Loss Claims

New Hampshire's total-loss framework is anchored in N.H. Admin. Code § Ins 1002.15 — an unusually prescriptive regulation that requires the insurer to provide a WRITTEN VALUATION REPORT itemizing the comparables used, the adjustments for condition/mileage/equipment, and the methodology applied. The regulation also gives the insured a 20-day reconsideration window on at-least-two-reliable-sources evidence of a higher value. Above the regulation sits the New Hampshire UCSPA at RSA 417 (no private right of action — enforced by the Insurance Commissioner). Critically, New Hampshire does NOT recognize a stand-alone first-party bad-faith tort: in Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire Insurance Co., 118 N.H. 607, 392 A.2d 576 (1978), the New Hampshire Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of the tort counts but reversed the contract-damages cap to allow consequential damages above policy limits on a breach-of-contract theory; Jarvis v. Prudential Ins. Co., 122 N.H. 648, 448 A.2d 407 (1982), reaffirmed that "the plaintiffs have no cause of action in tort." The 75% repair-to-pre-loss-ACV salvage threshold is administered under RSA 261:22 (with operational detail in the DMV's Saf-C 1900 rules).

Source: gencourt.state.nh.us ↗ · As of May 21, 2026